Basically correcting the fact it wouldn’t work in the TCG otherwise.
Exosister Betrayal had mistranslated text that prevented it from properly working with the rest of the Exosister Deck:
When this card is activated: Add 2 “Exosister” monsters from your Deck to your hand, then discard 1 card. You can target 1 face-up monster you control; immediately after this effect resolves, Normal Summon 1 “Exosister” monster mentioned on that monster. If a monster(s) is sent to your opponent’s GY, even during the Damage Step: You can banish 1 of them (their choice). You can only use each effect of “Exosister Betrayal” once per turn.
Join our Discord to discuss this article, consider joining our Patreon to help keep the lights on for our decade-plus all-volunteer effort.
18 Comments
Lmao! Exosisters and Strikers deserve erratums!
Does anyone know when we’re getting Chaos Origins reveals and LOCH reveals?
Probably starting around the 7th of February.
This year KONAMI hasn’t announced the usual deck building packs (you know, the ones that introduce 3 new archetypes)
They announce 1 pack each 6 months
Do you think they will tone it down for this year ? because by now they should’ve already announced the three new archetypes
Erratas*
*Errata
How do you people always accurately predict the reveal schedules? Please teach me your ways!
Observing past behavior can let you predict patterns of future events.
RARE KONAMI W
A minor detail I don’t see the difference with as the “Use each once per turn” I think explains it well enough
It’s the difference between you banishing the card (old text, wouldn’t trigger Exosister effects) and the opponent being forced to banish the card (new text, does trigger Exosister effects).
That’s not what the issue was. Most of the Exosister cards activate when the OPPONENT moves a card out of the GY, not when you do it. The phasing before made you banish
As others have said, this is about who is responsible for the final action. Incorrect text had you performing the banishing while your opponent just chooses which card. The correct text establishes that your opponent is responsible for the entire action of banishing. This distinction is especially important in Exosisters.
The mistaken translation is so clunky in its wording reminds me of that one MtG card that was phrased in such a way that the card itself had to decide a target.
The text as it has precedent in cards like Switchpoint (which ironically is itself mistranslated). It’s a way to have the opponent perform an action, while still also being treated as though the action is performed by a card effect. Unlike say Evenly Matched, which has the opponent perform an action, while NOT being treated as though the action is performed by a card effect.
Good, because that was a huge downgrade before
Some men drown while Prohibition thirsts.
I only just now found out they fixed Fusion Tag.
Saben cuándo salen las revelaciones del soporte de full art? Lo de the hero y the rival.